Thursday, October 27, 2005

"its me and the moon she says..."

rocky 6. seriously? number 6? six? VI? good lord, when will it stop?

now, let it be known that i have never seen any rocky movie. not 1, or 2 or the one with mr. t, or the russian, or whatever. i have seen clips of rocky on "i love the 80s" or clicking through tnt during thanksgiving, but thats about it. i also remember in 'space balls' when the news reporter mentions something about rocky 4000. but that is the extent of my rocky experience, except when i tell people ive never seen any of them and they are like "WHAT?!? are you un-american? do you hate freedom?"

so when i complain about rocky 6 right now, its more of a "why are they making the same movie that has already been made a gazillion times before?" and then its a "and why the hell are people STILL going to see this movie? are they retarded?" and then i think "no, that cant be. retarded people are smarter than that." why in the hell are they making a rocky 6? seriously.

and whats worse? yup, you guessed it. rambo 4. say whaaaaat?!?!? sly stallone, 59 years young, doing BOTH a new rocky AND a new stallone? dude, seriously. i had my fill of old used-to-be-jacked actors who now look fat and have spare tires around their stomachs doing remakes of their used-to-be popular 70s and 80s action movies when the governator did terminator 3. notice how when he came back from the future in that movie, they shot him "naked" from the mid torso up? its cuz he's fat. and i cannot imagine that sly is going to be much better. i mean, im sure he keeps in great shape. but to be taking on whole armies by himself kicking 60? and boxing? dude... osteoperosis is setting in and he's probably got to use a walker to get into the ring.

but honestly. rambo 4? a buddy of mine the other day was like "huh, the 3 amigos [yes, the steve martin, chevy chase, martin short movie -- TOTALLY awesome, by the way] was a great movie. i wonder why they didnt make a sequel to it". and my response was simple. "probably because they didnt want to ruin a good movie by making a shitty sequel". and i think the hollywood execs should take this to heart. but they wont do that until they stop making money on these shitty sequels. and that means there must be no demand. which means all you assholes going to see "ring 2" and fucking "goonies 8" and "scary movie 35" need to stop going to see shitty remakes. and then this world will be a better place.

now, dont get me wrong; im not saying there shouldnt be movies with others attached to them. like trilogies. lord of the rings, indiana jones, etc. those are awesome. im talking about any movie with "2" or "3" in the title. stop that shit. its up to us people; so check yourself before you wreck yourself. word.

"and ive got no trouble with that."

No comments: